family, focus on the family, family images, family poem, importance of family, family planning, family quotes, family advice, helping families
| Relationships |
|---|
| Family law |
|---|
| Marriage and similar status |
|
| Dissolution of marriage |
|
| Parent legal |
|
| Child legal |
|
| Conflict of laws |
|
| Related areas |
|
There are also concepts of family that break with tradition within particular societies, or those that are transplanted via migration to flourish or else cease within their new societies. As a unit of socialization the family is the object of analysis for sociologists of the family. Genealogy is a field which aims to trace family lineages through history. In science, the term "family" has come to be used as a means to classify groups of objects as being closely and exclusively related. In the study of animals it has been found that many species form groups that have similarities to human "family"—often called "packs." Sexual relations among family members are regulated by rules concerning incest such as the incest taboo.
Extended from the human "family unit" by affinity and consanguinity are concepts of family that are physical and metaphorical, or that grow increasingly inclusive extending to community, village, city, region, nationhood, global village and humanism.
Family is also an important economic unit. Economic aspects of family is subject of family economics branch within economics field.
Procreation
One of the primary functions of the family is to produce and reproduce
persons, biologically and/or socially. This can occur through the
sharing of material substances (such as food); the giving and receiving
of care and nurture (nurture kinship); jural ties of rights and obligations; and moral and sentimental ties. Thus, one's experience of one's family shifts over time. From the perspective of children, the family is a "family of orientation": the family serves to locate children socially and plays a major role in their enculturation and socialization.
From the point of view of the parent(s), the family is a "family of
procreation," the goal of which is to produce and enculturate and
socialize children. However, producing children is not the only function of the family; in societies with a sexual division of labor, marriage, and the resulting relationship between two people, it is necessary for the formation of an economically productive household.A "conjugal" family includes only the husband, the wife, and unmarried
children who are not of age. The most common form of this family is
regularly referred to in sociology as a nuclear family.
A "consanguineal" family consists of a parent and his or her children,
and other people. Although the concept of consanguinity originally
referred to relations by "blood," cultural anthropologists
have argued that one must understand the idea of "blood" metaphorically
and that many societies understand family through other concepts rather
than through genetic distance. A "matrilocal" family consists of a mother
and her children. Generally, these children are her biological
offspring, although adoption of children is a practice in nearly every
society. This kind of family is common where women have the resources to
rear their children by themselves, or where men are more mobile than
women.More Details Visit more For Sports Visit For School Visit us For Game & Video songs Download For software & Holiday Packages For Property & news For Yuvraj Sixes & Body Armour Best Crockery Items Googel Adwords Free Website Catering Sports Goods Manufacturer Gym Equipments
FAMILY CHART
Keys to Having a Happy Family on Earth
Happiness within our family will most likely be achieved when it’s
founded on the teachings of Jesus. That means being unselfish, honest,
loyal, loving and a whole host of other virtues, not to mention a lot of
effort. A loving and happy family doesn’t happen by accident.Thinking back on our own family. There were times that were happy and times that weren’t. What were the happiest moments? Most likely they were when we felt loved. When our Dad cried because we were sick. When we saw our parents laugh and smile, and could see how much they loved each other. When my sister gave me a high five for scoring a goal, or vice versa. When I broke a window and my parents forgave me instead of yelling at me. When the car slid off the road during a blizzard and our family had to walk several miles for help. We held hands and sang to make the time go by faster. Our family pitched in to dig someone else out of the snow. My family suffered through my high school musical even though I was just a stagehand. Maybe our family prayed, sang songs, or attended church together. We can recreate those happy times today within our own family and marriage. If our family didn’t have many of those happy moments when we were young, then we want to make things different now.
Campaign for Inclusive Family Policies
The purpose of the Campaign for Inclusive Family Policies is to establish this basic principle in public policymaking: Family policy should be inclusive—the ways in which families meet their income-earning and caregiving responsibilities should not determine their eligibility for support and services. More Details Visit more For Sports Visit For School Visit us For Game & Video songs Download For software & Holiday Packages For Property & news For Yuvraj Sixes & Body Armour Best Crockery Items Googel Adwords Free Website Catering Sports Goods Manufacturer Gym EquipmentsThere is a serious disconnect between U.S. families and family policy. For decades, policymakers have been pushed to focus on “working families” with the result that many family policies help some families while discriminating against millions of others. The often ill-defined term “working families” is used most commonly to describe families with employed parents who utilize child care services while they are at work. But millions of families do not fit that model—instead they use diverse and dynamic strategies to meet their income-earning and caregiving responsibilities. It is time for policymakers to support and respect parents’ decisions. They should begin by adopting the principle of inclusion: the ways in which families meet their income-earning and caregiving responsibilities should not determine their eligibility for support and services.
This is not a campaign against “working families”—it is a campaign for helping the greatest possible number of families, regardless of how they manage their income-earning and caregiving responsibilities. In short, it is a call for inclusion.
Parents make complex decisions about employment and caring for their children. They weigh their children’s needs, their own values and desires, as well as economic and career considerations. Families are diverse, their work/life solutions are diverse, and their choices are dynamic. Many families modify their employment and caregiving practices over the years as the needs of their family members change. Today’s “working family” might in two years be a family with an at-home mother or father, and ten years from now it might fit the “working family” category once more.
Policies made with a narrow focus on “working families” discriminate against a significant percentage of families, including—contrary to popular belief—many lower income families. Commenting on the findings of his recent research on low-income families (earning less than $38,000 for a family of four), Gregory Acs of The Urban Institute says: “The need for child care is very important for families that have no other options. But what you most often see is the dad going out to work and the mom staying at home.” Families who do not fit the “working families” label cross the spectrum of economic status, cultural and political outlooks, religious beliefs, race and ethnicity and include:
- Families with one full-time earner and one at-home parent;
- Families in which two earners work different shifts so that one or the other is available for caregiving, including those who have full-time jobs and “tag-team” by working different shifts, those with one full-time earner and one part-time earner, and those with two part-time earners;
- Families who share caregiving among members of their extended family or trade caregiving with friends in a cooperative arrangement (strategies used by some single parent families as well as by two parent families);
- Families in which children are being raised by retired grandparents.
Child care policy is a prime example of biased policy. Currently, families who use child care services are eligible for several types of government assistance. Many families who pay for child care are eligible for the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit or a Dependent Care Assistance Plan, enabling them to set aside pre-tax earnings for child care expenses. Many moderate and lower-income families qualify to receive federal and/or state child care subsidies. But families who do not use child care services—even those with very low incomes—are not eligible for any assistance.
A few states have tried to help lower income families who want to have a parent at home by establishing At-Home Infant Care programs, providing a monthly stipend in lieu of a subsidy for child care. However, states are unable to use federal funds to support these programs, public awareness of such programs is low, and very few families receive assistance.
All quality care for children must be supported—including care provided by parents who cut back or forgo paid employment. The ways in which parents meet their income-earning and caregiving responsibilities should not determine their eligibility for support and services.
Special interest lobbyists are a serious obstacle to inclusive family policies. Funding for advocacy on behalf of “working families” comes from a variety of sources including labor unions, for-profit child care businesses, and corporations—all of which have economic interests in keeping parents on the job. Fifty-five major corporations, for instance, are partners of Corporate Voices for Working Families, a “national business membership organization representing the private sector voice in the dialogue on public policy issues involving working families.” This has made for a very lopsided debate. Although there are a few grassroots organizations advocating for the families left out when “working families” are the focus of policy making, they operate with severe financial limitations. They are no match to the financial resources of major corporations on staffing, lobbying and public relations expenditures.
There is no doubt that family policies need attention. In April 2007, tax expert C. Eugene Steuerle, a senior fellow at the nonpartisan Urban Institute, warned that children’s share of the federal budget has fallen significantly in the past 50 years and is projected to decline dramatically in the next ten years. Additionally, Steuerle and his colleagues at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center point out that families “face a bewildering and often conflicting array of tax programs and eligibility rules.” By establishing the principle of inclusion legislators would take a major step toward crafting straightforward, fair and flexible policies.
